So who won?

So who won yesterday? Was it the group in favour of Valentine's day celebrations or the one against it? TOI making everyone believe that this was a game with the two opponents clearly marked out and only one was going to win.

Anyway, now that the dust has settled, I picked up today's newspapers. I subscribe to two newspapers, Vijaya Karnataka in Kannada and Times of India. Incidentally, TOI bought VK a couple of years back, so both are now owned by the same parent company. However, there is a big difference between what these two reported about yesterday.

VK version:
"ಬಿಗಿ ಬಂದೋಬಸ್ತ್ ನಡುವೆಯೂ ಪ್ರೇಮಿಗಳ ದಿನಾಚರಣೆಗೆ ರಾಜ್ಯದ ಹಲವೆಡೆ ಅಡ್ಡಿ-ಆತಂಕ ಎದುರಾಯಿತು.
...
ಶ್ರೀರಾಮ ಸೇನೆಯ ಬೆದರಿಕೆಯಿಂದಾಗಿ ಪ್ರೇಮಿಗಳ ದಿನಾಚರಣೆ ಬೆಂಗಳೂರಿನಲ್ಲಿ ರಂಗೇರಲಿಲ್ಲ. ಲಾಲ ಬಾಗ್, ಕಬ್ಬನ್ ಪಾರ್ಕ್, ಕಾಲೇಜು ಕಾರ್ನರ್, ರೆಸ್ಟೋರೆಂಟ್, ಪಬ್ಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ರೇಮಿಗಳ ಎಂದಿನ ಕಲರವ ಕಾಣಸಿಗಲಿಲ್ಲ."

which roughly translates to:
"In spite of heavy security, there was disruption to Valentine's day celebrations in many places of the state.
...
Due to the threat by Sri Rama Sene Vantentine's day celebrations in Bangalore was pale. Lal Bagh, Cubbon Park, college corners, restaurants and pubs did not see the usual level of revelry."

TOI version:
"Love and peace thrived in perfect harmony in Bangalore and other parts of Karnataka on one of the most-anticipated Valentine’s Days ever. Bangalore was swathed in red and pink. Thanks to the police which put away potential disrupters, including Hindu Rashtriya Sena chief Pramod Mutalik, behind bars and the civil society which decided to push back hard against moral policing, V-Day came up smelling roses.
...
By evening, the boulevards of MG Road and the sidewalks of Brigade Road, Residency Road and other high streets were chock-ablock with youngsters, out with friends and love interests, in throngs. Pubs began to fill up as the sun came down and restaurants reported brisk footfalls. Star eateries, which had sold out their V-day specials, saw couples — young and old — enjoying their romantic dinners serenaded by romantic music and covered by discreet, high security.
...
The scene was similar in other parts of the state, though the scale and colour of the festivities were a pitch lower than Bangalore."

Wow, isn't that strange? Two newspapers from the same publishing house, reporting on the same incidence, being so different in their reports? One thing that is very clear from all this is that TOI, though it owns VK, doesn't have much control over the contents of it. May be they want to give this kind of independence to VK, but my bets are that with the kind of people who run VK, it won't be possible for TOI to control the contents of VK too much unless they kick out a lot of the editorial folks.